#1503 Update to clarify levels for Continuity Management (COPL) change request accepted
Some level descriptions for Continuity Management (COPL) don't seem to align to the levels of responsibility
Level 2 description sounds a little high - why aren't they assisting?
Level 3 - are they really developing continuity plans at level 3 or are they collecting the inputs, supporting testing etc?
Mismatch of level descriptions: Level 3 "develop and document" but level 4 "contributes to the development"
Copied from SFIA 9. See there for any old comments.
Proposed change applies to Continuity management
Current status of this request: accepted
What we decided
The level descriptions and the progression in responsibility between levels should be clarified.
What we changed
Updated levels 2,3 and 4.