The global skills and competency framework for the digital world

#1503 Update to clarify levels for Continuity Management (COPL) change request pending

Some level descriptions for Continuity Management (COPL) don't seem to align to the levels of responsibility

Level 2 description sounds a little high - why aren't they assisting?
Level 3 - are they really developing continuity plans at level 3 or are they collecting the inputs, supporting testing etc?
Mismatch of level descriptions: Level 3 "develop and document" but level 4 "contributes to the development"

Proposed change applies to Continuity management

Current status of this request: pending

nz sfia users