#1537 Confirm interaction of Change Control (CHMG) with other process skills change request accepted
Clarify intended interaction of RELM, CHMG, SEAC, as they seem to overlap unnecessarily
Risk evaluation and communication of intended change needs to be a key part of the skill at all levels, yet the lower levels can be read as procedural form pushing without showing the value of the skill.
Level 2/3 don't have any assessing of risk which is the purpose of the skill.
Does SFIA have a view on how RELM, CHMG, SEAC fit together?
Copied from SFIA 9. See there for any old comments.
Proposed change applies to Change control
Current status of this request: accepted
What we decided
Responsibilities for risk can be made clearer in levels 2,3 and 4
What we changed
Changes to levels 2,3 and 4