#1537 Confirm interaction of Change Control (CHMG) with other process skills change request pending
Clarify intended interaction of RELM, CHMG, SEAC, as they seem to overlap unnecessarily
Risk evaluation and communication of intended change needs to be a key part of the skill at all levels, yet the lower levels can be read as procedural form pushing without showing the value of the skill.
Level 2/3 don't have any assessing of risk which is the purpose of the skill.
Does SFIA have a view on how RELM, CHMG, SEAC fit together?
Proposed change applies to Service acceptance
Current status of this request: pending